Interpretation of Ecology in the Study of the Qur'an: Systematic Literature Review on Environmental Ethics and Sustainability

Authors

  • Sania Rahma Harfia Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Muhammad Sholahuddin Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58438/alkarima.v10i2.674

Keywords:

Ecological interpretation, The Qur'an, Islamic environmental ethics, Systematic literature review, Sustainability

Abstract

The global ecological crisis demands an Islamic scientific response that is able to connect the message of the Qur'an with environmental issues, sustainability, and human responsibility towards nature. This study aims to analyze the characteristics, approaches, differences in focus, and contribution of ecological interpretation studies in contemporary scientific literature. The method used was a systematic literature review by adapting the PRISMA principle through searching for articles with the theme of ecology, the environment, the Qur'an, and Islamic teachings; from the initial 2,589 articles, the selection process resulted in 6 studies that were analyzed in depth. The synthesis of the six studies shows that ecological interpretation remains predominantly conceptual and normative, with some evidence of comparative and empirical approaches within the reviewed corpus. The main themes that emerged included khalīfah, amānah, mīzān, fasād fi al-arḍ, isrāf, conservation, disaster mitigation, and sustainability. The ecological interpretation differs from the general thematic interpretation because it not only describes nature as a sign of God's power, but also leads to the formation of environmental ethics, criticism of the exploitation of nature, and the strengthening of ecological awareness. The novelty of this research lies in the systematic mapping of the characteristics, approaches, and contributions of the ecological interpretation literature in a single synthesis framework. Its contribution is to provide a conceptual basis for the development of Qur'anic environmental ethics, Islamic-based environmental education, ecological da'wah, and sustainability policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelzaher, D., Kotb, A., & Helfaya, A. (2019). Eco-Islam: Beyond the Principles of Why and What, and Into the Principles of How. Journal of Business Ethics, 155, 623-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3518-2.

Alfiyah, A., Yuliawati, S., & Utami, F. (2024). Humans as Caliphs on Earth Environmental Responsibility in Islamic Perspective. Jurnal Kajian Islam. https://doi.org/10.56566/jki.v1i2.243.

Ali, M., & Agushi, M. (2024). Eco-Islam: Integrating Islamic Ethics into Environmental Policy for Sustainable Living. International Journal of Religion. https://doi.org/10.61707/gq0we205.

Arsyad, M., Hasanah, N., Arsyad, M., & Hasanah, N. (2025). Islamic Ecological Values: The Concept of Caliph and Trust. Al-Mustafid, 4(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.30984/mustafid.v4i1.1361

Bsoul, L. A., Omer, A., Kucukalic, L., & Archbold, R. H. (2022). Islam’s Perspective on Environmental Sustainability: A Conceptual Analysis. Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11060228.

Büchter, R., Weise, A., & Pieper, D. (2020). Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01143-3.

Diman, H. (2025). A Model of Interpretation of Ecological Verses According to Contemporary Interpretation Scholars in the Digital Era. Journal of Social Technology. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v5i11.32504.

Downs, S., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52, 377 - 384. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.52.6.377.

Gani, F., Amaliya, N., & Dardirie, A. (2025). Ecological Interpretation: Analysis of Qur'anic Verses on the Environment from a Contemporary Interpretation Perspective. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmilf.v5i2.1676.

Grednovskaya, E., Emchenko, Y., & Solomko, D. (2024). Homo ecologicus: concepts, discourses, practices. Sotsium i vlast/Society and Power. https://doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2024-3-80-93.

Helmi, F., Nurhakim, I., & Munawar, A. (2026). Qur'anic Ecotheology as Environmental Critique: Reinterpreting Fasad fi al-Ard in QS. Ar-Rum [30]: 41 in Extractive Economic Practices. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v5i1.15973.

Holzer, J., Carmon, N., & Orenstein, D. E. (2018). A methodology for evaluating transdisciplinary research on coupled socio-ecological systems. Ecological Indicators, 85, 808-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.074.

Ibrahim, I., Razak, T. R. A. A., Asmawi, M., & Sarkawi, A. (2024). Environmental Conservation In Islamic Perspective: A Systematic Review. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v5i6.589.

Ihsan, M. H., T, M. A., N, R. M., Nurfauzia, S., & Candra, T. (2023). The role of disaster mitigation education is to build preparedness to face natural disaster threats. Jagaddhita Journal, 1(2), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.58268/jagaddhita.v1i2.41

Ihsan, N., & Mudin, M. I. (2020). The kalam paradigm in environmental conservation according to Said Nursi. 27-45. https://doi.org/10.21111/tasfiyah.v4i1.4052.

Jannah, F. (2025). Ecological Philosophy and Anthropocentrism in the Climate Crisis: Exploring the Role of Humans in Facing the Global Environmental Crisis. Journal of Islamic Jerusalem Studies. https://doi.org/10.62509/ajis.v2i1.247

Jonsson, M., Johansson, S., Hussain, D., Gulliksen, J., & Gustavsson, C. (2023). Development and Evaluation of eHealth Services Regarding Accessibility: Scoping Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25. https://doi.org/10.2196/45118.

Khasani, F. (2025). Khil?fah, Taskh?r, and Sustainability: Reconstructing Islamic Eco-Theology through Al-Qur?ub?'s Tafsir. ISTIFHAM: Journal Of Islamic Studies. https://doi.org/10.71039/istifham.v3i2.111.

Knobloch, K., Yoon, U., & Vogt, P. M. (2011). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias.. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 39 2, 91-2 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.001.

Levitt, H., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J., Frost, D., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.. The American psychologist, 73 1, 26-46 . https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151.

Li, R., Wang, X., Lawler, K., Garg, S., Bai, Q., & Alty, J. (2022). Applications of artificial intelligence to aid early detection of dementia: A scoping review on current capabilities and future directions. Journal of biomedical informatics, 104030 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104030.

Mather, M., Kuck, S., & Oliver, D. (2026). Statistical Facilitation in Environmental Science: Integrating Results from Complementary Statistical Analyses Can Improve Ecological Interpretations. Environments. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13020082.

Moge, R., Abubakar, A., & M. (2025). Ecological Education In The Perspective Of The Qur’an: Islamic Solutions To Environmental Crisis And Climate Change. Irfani. https://doi.org/10.30603/irfani.v21i3.6996.

Montazeri, A., Mohammadi, S., M.Hesari, P., Ghaemi, M., Riazi, H., & Sheikhi-Mobarakeh, Z. (2023). Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements. Systematic Reviews, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02410-2.

Muhammad, M., Yaqin, M., Mahfud, F., & Alahmadi, F. (2024). Freedom that is not Absolute: Ecological Ethics and Human-Nature Relationship in the Qur'an. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5821.

Muhammad-Lawal, A. A., Arvita, R. F., Inayati, N., & Apriyantoro, M. S. (2025). Implementation Curriculum Islamic Studies in Shaping Spiritual Attitudes Scopus Data Analysis in Bibliometrics. Journal of Educational Management and Strategy. https://doi.org/10.57255/jemast.v4i1.1468.

Muhriningsih, V. T., Shofa, ?. K., & Gifari, M. (2024). Integrating Islamic Teachings: Enhancing Environmental Awareness in the Digital Era Through Qur'anic Interpretations. TAFSE: Journal of Qur'anic Studies. https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v9i1.22789.

Nur, A., Husin, H. B., A., & Yasir, M. (2025). Qur'anic Ecotheology and the Ethics of Forest Protection in Indonesia. Journal of the Study of the Sciences of the Qur'an and Hadith. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v26i2.6312.

Rasyid, M. R. A., & Muchtar, M. (2026). Reactualizing Qur'anic Environmental Ethics for Sustainable Urban River Management. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v5i1.16140.

Setianingrum, D. A., S., & Dwiyanto, A. (2024). Environmental Education through Islamic Lens: Values and Practices. E3S Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448204014.

Susana, L. M., Tripalupi, R. I., Kholil, S., Efendi, N., & Sakinah, G. (2025). Reconstructing Islamic Legal Norms in Environmental Governance: A Maqasid-Based Legal Critique of Indonesia’s Resource Policies. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i2.13038.

Tang, T., Zhao, M., Wang, D., Chen, X., Chen, W., Xie, C., & Ding, Y. (2022). Does Environmental Interpretation Impact Public Ecological Flow Experience and Responsible Behavior? A Case Study of Potatso National Park, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159630.

Ulya, M., Masyhuri, A. A., Chairunnisa, C., Jawwas, F. A., & Wijaya, S. (2025). Moderate Enlightenment Based on The Qur'an in Islamic Higher Education: Social-Cultural Education Strategies to Achieve Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16. Al-Mutharahah: Journal of Religious Social Research and Studies. https://doi.org/10.46781/al-mutharahah.v22i02.2065.

Wani, N. H., & Azhar, A. (2024). Islamic Environmental Ethics: Preserving the Sacred Balance. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.20924 .

Wei, R. (2021). An interpersonal framework of international ecological discourse. Journal of World Languages, 7, 305 - 333. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2020-0004.

Yu, Q., Ji, W., Prihodko, L., Ross, C. W., Anchang, J., & Hanan, N. (2021). Study becomes insight: Ecological learning from machine learning. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 2117 - 2128. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13686.

Yuwana, R. Y., & Hakim, C. (2024). Integrating Classical Islamic Philosophical Thought and Modern Environmental Ethics: Toward a Sharia-Rooted Eco-Theology for Global Sustainability. Harmony Philosophy: International Journal of Islamic Religious Studies and Sharia. https://doi.org/10.70062/harmonyphilosophy.v1i1.324.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-22

How to Cite

Harfia, S. R., & Sholahuddin, M. (2026). Interpretation of Ecology in the Study of the Qur’an: Systematic Literature Review on Environmental Ethics and Sustainability. Al Karima : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al Quran Dan Tafsir, 10(2), 649–679. https://doi.org/10.58438/alkarima.v10i2.674